Private Wealth Management

Considered counsel for digital wealth.

EUDA·ICA advises a deliberately small number of households on the structuring, custody and long-term stewardship of significant crypto-native portfolios. Independent, retainer-based, with no proprietary product and no retrocessions.

The discipline required to serve crypto-native clients is harder to fake than in conventional public markets. Holdings either reconcile to chain state, or they do not. EUDA·ICA team — On stewardship at the family scale
The practice

A specialised mandate, held with restraint.

Digital wealth has matured from a speculative position into an asset class that deserves the same fiduciary discipline as any other component of a family balance sheet. The firms equipped to handle it are still few.

EUDA·ICA was built around that gap. The partnership advises a small number of households on portfolios that combine ETH spot, liquid staking, vetted DeFi strategies, regulated stablecoins, and cold storage — under a flat retainer that does not increase with assets, and without retrocessions of any kind.

We are not a fund. We do not solicit deposits, take custody, or trade on behalf of clients. Every position is held by the client, in the client's name, and reconcilable to chain state at any moment.

USD 1.4 bn
Assets under advisory
+500
Client households
99,9%
Uptime guarantee
0
Retrocessions accepted
What we do

Three disciplines, one mandate.

All services
Performance posture

Returns we plan for, not returns we promise.

We frame the income profile of a EUDA·ICA mandate in target bands derived from observed protocol economics over rolling twelve-month periods. The bands below reflect the discipline of selection, not a forecast.

Liquid staking
3.0 – 3.4% APY
stETH / rETH · twelve-month target band

Income, denominated in ETH

Consensus rewards on Ethereum, accessed through audited liquid staking tokens. Income compounds in ETH terms, independent of dollar price action.

DeFi strategies — risk-controlled
4.5 – 6.0% APY
Aave v3, Curve · named protocols only

Curated allocation

Targeted exposure to a handful of vetted protocols with multi-year audit history. Sized below five percent of the mandate per protocol.

Regulated stablecoins
4.5 – 5.2% APY
USDC, DAI · post-MiCA framework

Cash-equivalent income

USD-denominated income from regulated stablecoins. Sized to cover twelve months of household liquidity at all times.

The figures above are targets, not commitments. Realised outcomes depend on protocol conditions, regulatory developments, and the structuring decisions specific to each client. EUDA·ICA does not earn a performance fee on client portfolios.

Why a specialised firm

Where private banks stop short.

The major private banks do many things competently. The custody, allocation and stewardship of significant crypto-native holdings is not consistently among them. The reasons are structural — and they will take a decade to resolve. EUDA·ICA exists for clients who do not have a decade.

01.

Self-custody, not omnibus accounts

Client assets are held in named wallets controlled by the client. We design the operational architecture; we do not take custody.

02.

Reconciled to chain state

Every position is verifiable on Ethereum at any moment. Reporting is descriptive, not creative.

03.

Mandate over product

We do not earn from product placement, retrocessions, or trading volume. The retainer aligns the incentives over decades, not quarters.

04.

Cross-jurisdictional fluency

Swiss, French and UK practice — coordinated for households with assets, residents, or heirs across multiple jurisdictions.

Sector perspective

The structural
opportunity in ETH.

Ethereum's transition to proof-of-stake has, for the first time, produced an income-bearing crypto asset with reconciliation properties closer to a sovereign bond than to a speculative position. The 3% to 3.5% yield band is not headline-grabbing. It is, by historical standards, the most replicable and audit-friendly source of crypto income to date.

Around that core, the regulated stablecoin layer in Europe has matured meaningfully since the MiCA framework began applying in mid-2024. The qualitative gap between regulated and crypto-native stablecoins has widened, and the conservative use of USDC and DAI now meets the threshold for inclusion in mandates that, two years ago, would have excluded any on-chain dollar exposure.

Risks remain, and we write about them in detail in our quarterly notes. Concentration in liquid staking protocols, layered slashing surfaces in restaking products, and the still-uneven regulatory treatment of digital assets in inter-generational transmission are all worth tracking. None of them, in our reading, are reasons to defer participation. They are reasons to participate through a specialised counsel.

From the editorial desk

Recent notes from the practice.

All insights

Begin a conversation.

Prospective clients are introduced through existing relationships or professional referral. We respond to all written inquiries.

Contact the firm